Book Review: Ancestoring: Understanding Records, Family, and Ourselves by Darcie Hind Posz

Published as a paperback by Genealogical Publishing Company

It’s Genealogy At Heart book review time and this one is unlike any I’ve written before.

I’m about to make a few bold claims. And I stand by every one of them:

  1. If you read only one book this year, Ancestoring: Understanding Records, Family, and Ourselves by Darcie Hind Posz should be that book.
  2. If I had to part with my entire genealogy library and keep just one volume, Ancestoring would stay.
  3. This book belongs in every high school curriculum.

That get your attention? It should.

Last month, I received two donated books to review. As always, I don’t accept payment, and there are no agreements, spoken or unspoken, that guarantee a favorable review. My long-time readers know I share my honest thoughts, whether glowing or critical.

Frankly, if I had judged this book by its cover or title alone, I might have passed it by and that would have been a mistake.

From the bottom of my heart, Ancestoring is the only book that has ever had this kind of positive impact on me.

Of the two books to review, I chose this one first simply because of the title. Ancestoring, what did that even mean? The preface answers that question, but more importantly, the book embodies it.

Before diving in, I read the back cover endorsement by Henry Z. “Hank” Jones, FASG. I’ve reviewed his work before, and if Hank was this enthusiastic, I was all in. (See those reviews here and here).

The book is divided into three sections, which Posz notes can be read in any order. I chose to move from the broad to the personal: understanding records, then families, and finally ourselves. Perhaps that reflects my own leanings toward a Gestalt approach; the idea that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. To fully grasp the interplay between these sections, I recommend working through all of them.

Take your time with this book. Do the exercises. If you’re pressed for time, read it through once, then return to it and savor each chapter. Don’t skip the footnotes! Even if you’re not typically a footnote reader, this book may convert you. The sourcing spans multiple disciplines, and that depth is precisely why I make my second and third claims, it’s not just a book, it’s a roadmap for continued intellectual growth.

As a former educator and counselor, I spent years helping students move from concrete to abstract thinking. Though Posz doesn’t frame it this way, I would go a step further: this book fosters lateral thinking, the kind of creative, non-linear problem-solving that genealogists desperately need. That alone justifies my belief that it belongs in every high school.

And for adults? The exercises are even more critical. Think about your daily news feed and your social media. How much of it is accurate? How do you know? This book gives you the tools to evaluate, question, and ultimately uncover truth.

The exercises themselves are refreshingly unconventional. Yes, you’ll learn to analyze photographs, vital records, and obituaries but through a much wider lens. Posz incorporates film, music, and even conspiracy theory narratives as training tools. At first glance, these seem unrelated to genealogy. They’re not. They sharpen how we observe, interpret, and question, skills at the heart of our work.

One of the most intriguing elements is the encouragement to record dreams related to your research. I’ve written about this before (here and here). When deeply immersed in a project, the mind doesn’t simply shut off. Whether it’s subconscious processing, inherited memory, or something we don’t yet understand, those impressions can sometimes point us in new directions. Other times, they signal it’s time to step away. Both are valuable.

The chapter on trauma deserves special attention. All though others have tried, Posz is the first genealogist to address, so directly and personally, how trauma can be researched and interpreted. Memory is not fixed. Two individuals can experience the same event and remember it in entirely different ways. That reminder is essential for anyone working with historical narratives.

I admit, I found myself wondering whether one vivid childhood memory Posz recounts, watching a film while hospitalized, might have been influenced by a dream while medicated. That, in a way, reinforces her point: our recollections are not infallible.

Finally, I applaud Posz for her transparency regarding her earlier work. Too often, we treat a completed project as final. It isn’t. New records surface. DNA reshapes conclusions. Even our most carefully constructed research can shift. Her discussion of ethnicity estimates is a timely reminder that patience and humility are essential in this field.

If genealogy is about understanding where we come from, Ancestoring pushes us further. It asks us to examine how we think, why we believe in what we do, and what it really means to know the past.

That’s why Ancestoring is not just a good book; it’s an essential one.

When “I Know I’m Right” Replaces Research: A Troubling Trend in Genealogy

AI Generated

In the past two weeks, I’ve received four emails from individuals new to genealogy either questioning my public tree on Ancestry.com or inquiring about my professional services.

Each one carried the same message: “The information you have is wrong.”

Let me start with something I say often: no genealogical tree is 100% accurate. Until every individual in every line has been DNA tested and even then, interpreted correctly, there will always be some uncertainty. That’s simply the nature of this work.

But these interactions weren’t thoughtful challenges or collaborative inquiries. They were something else entirely.

They were confrontational, dismissive, and, frankly, uninformed.

The first individual demanded proof of a family adoption story. I recommended DNA testing. They had already tested but refused to share the results and insisted I find documentary proof.

Here’s the problem: no records exist for that place and time. None. The best available evidence is a census record placing the child in the same household at three months old and still there decades later. That wasn’t enough. I was told I didn’t know what I was doing.

DNA would likely resolve the question but there’s a reason it wasn’t being shared. DNA doesn’t lie. And when people avoid it, that usually tells you something.

The second email was even more puzzling. I was instructed to delete an individual from my tree because it was “messing up [her] DNA matches.”

We didn’t match.
The individual in question is on my husband’s line.
She didn’t match him either.

Her conclusion? A child who died young actually moved to Illinois, changed his name completely, married, and died in the 1940s.

Her evidence?An Ancestry hint from ten years ago that only matched a birthdate. No sources showed a name change. No documentation. No records connecting the identities. Just confidence that in the entirety of Sweden, only 1 male was born on the same day. I’m not making this up!

When I asked basic genealogical questions such as death certificate? marriage record? naturalization? she didn’t understand what I meant. She had been researching for a few months and was certain her conclusion was correct because a now deceased relative had believed it 10 years ago. I declined to alter a fully sourced line.

The third interaction was more familiar but still frustrating.

A man insisted I had the wrong parents for his great-grandfather. His proof was a death certificate, with information provided by the son.

I explained what experienced genealogists know: informants can be wrong. Memory fails. Grief clouds details.

In contrast, I had a letter written by the man himself shortly before his death, naming his parents and explaining his childhood circumstances. I even provided the citation so he could verify it.

His response? “You’re still wrong. Remove it.” He also admitted he didn’t know how to locate the record I referred to online. Sigh.

That was the point where I made a decision: I removed the entire line from my public tree. Not because I was wrong but because the interaction wasn’t worth the time it would take to defend it.

The final exchange involved a demand to remove a death record because “everyone has it wrong.”

No documentation was provided. Instead, the argument rested on a theory built from DNA matches and a guess involving a child being banished to another colony 300+ years ago.

Could there be a connection? Possibly.

Was there proof? No.

When I tried to guide her toward alternative explanations, such as descent from a sibling, she wasn’t interested. She didn’t want to explore the truth. She wanted confirmation.

So I’ll ask the question plainly: Are you experiencing this shift, too?

For over 25 years, I’ve found most genealogists to be curious, collaborative, and open to learning. But recently, something feels different.

More certainty.
Less evidence.
And a growing resistance to being wrong.

I had a conversation about this with my husband, who pointed me to research from the National Literacy Institute suggesting that a significant portion of U.S. adults read below a sixth-grade level.

As a former reading teacher, that stopped me.

Because genealogy requires more than reading, it requires interpretation, analysis, and the ability to weigh conflicting evidence.

Without those skills, it becomes easy to mistake a hint for proof… or a belief for a conclusion.

And that brings me to where I am now.

I’ve always believed in keeping my tree public. I don’t “own” my ancestors. I’ve invested time and money into my research because I wanted to know the truth, not because I expected anything in return.

But I’ll be honest: I’m reconsidering. Not because of disagreement. Disagreement is part of good research. But because of something else entirely:

A refusal to learn.
A rejection of standards.
And an insistence that confidence equals correctness.

In every one of these cases, I recommended learning about the Genealogical Proof Standard.

Not one person was interested. That’s the real concern. Because if we lose the standard…we don’t just lose accuracy, we lose genealogy itself.

If you’re thinking this is an AI problem, it isn’t. Genealogists have always worked with flawed records, mistaken informants, and misleading clues.
What is new is the speed at which conclusions are formed and the confidence with which they’re defended without the work required to support them.

If you’re new to genealogy, welcome. Truly. But confidence is not evidence. And belief is not proof. Start there and you’ll go far.

RootsTech is on the Horizon!

I’ll be heading to Salt Lake City for RootsTech, and if you’re attending in person, I’d truly love to connect. I’ll be presenting Voices That Vanish: Capturing Stories That Matter on 5 March at 9:30 AM in Room 155 EF, and you’re warmly invited to join me.

I also have a second session, What They Didn’t Write Down, available as a pre-recorded presentation available on 3/4 at 9:00 AM Mountain Time; please be sure to check that out as well.

Looking ahead, I’m becoming more intentional about meeting readers and fellow genealogists face-to-face, whether I’m presenting or simply attending. Conferences are as much about conversation as they are about lectures, and I hope this is the beginning of more informal, meaningful connections. If you see me at RootsTech, please say hello, I’d love that.

Palatines of America Conference Info

Registration opened for the 2026 Palatines to America National Conference, to be held in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, June 19, 2026. Early registration discount is available until April 15. The conference has activities and tours planned in addition to many presentations by genealogy experts on subjects related to German migration, military service, occupations, Revolutionary War experience, Amish and Mennonite research, and more. I’ll be presenting two talks – Palatinate Pathways:  From One Homeland to Many American Homes and From Soldiering to Civil Life. See full details at https://www.pennpalam.org/cpage.php?pt=19

Smart Roots: Hands-On AI for Family Historians

I’m pleased to share that I’ll be presenting a workshop at the National Genealogical Society Conference: WS01 Starting Smart with AI: Hands-On Tools for Family Historians, and I’d love for you to join me.

This session is designed to be practical and immediately useful, focusing on real examples, hands-on tools, and strategies that help family historians integrate AI thoughtfully into their research and workflow. Whether you’re just getting started or looking to refine how you use these tools, you’ll leave with ideas you can put into practice right away.

If you’re interested in attending, you can register using my personal referral link and code below:

🔗 https://whova.com/portal/registration/LEUZPBaoRt-vaFngte8X/?refer_code=plqof
🎟️ Referral Code: plqof

I hope to see some familiar faces in Fort Wayne, Indiana on 26 May, 9:00 AM–12:00 PM. Feel free to share this with colleagues or anyone interested in genealogy, research methodology, or practical AI applications.

Dual Citizenship – An Update

AI Image

In November–December 2026, I wrote a series of blog posts about my experience obtaining records for dual citizenship. Since then, I’ve received weekly messages from people interested in pursuing dual citizenship themselves.

Let me be clear: I didn’t write those posts to discourage anyone. I wrote them to be transparent.

If I were hiring someone to help me with a complex, expensive, emotionally charged process, I would want honesty about the cost, the delays, the bureaucracy, and the unexpected hurdles. That’s what I aim to provide my clients in every aspect of my work.

One important disclosure: I contract with citizenship.eu and do not take private clients for dual citizenship applications. My role here is to share my experience, not to sell services.

By early December, I had finally received every record I requested, starting back in July. The last document to arrive was from NARA–DC: my grandmother’s ship manifest, which came on December 3. I didn’t blog about that particular request because it was made online but it came with its own challenges. The NARA website doesn’t always cooperate, the government shutdown delayed retrieval, and I couldn’t find a genealogist available to physically retrieve the record in Washington, D.C.

So yes, even the “easy” requests weren’t always easy. I then had to send it off to be apostilled. The record was returned to me 3 days ago.

If you’re considering dual citizenship, here’s what I wish someone had told me before I started.

  • Contact the consulate before you do anything else. Not after. Not halfway through. Before. This ensures you understand exactly what they require and it puts you on their radar. In my case, I was emailed detailed instructions which were clear and helpful.

Begin acquiring records and brace yourself. This phase is both expensive and time-consuming. I ordered two certified copies of every record and obtained several documents I didn’t initially plan to submit, simply to have a complete, redundant set in case anything was lost or damaged.

My total cost for records was $1317.80. That included my immigrant grandmother’s birth, marriage, death, ship manifest, and naturalization records; my mother’s birth and baptismal records (because no civil birth record existed), marriage, and death certificates; my own birth and marriage records (both church and civil, because my given name differed); my husband’s birth certificate; and the birth certificates of my adult children and their partners. Some of us all also needed to update our passports which were due for renewal.

I also obtained records I didn’t expect to submit, death certificates for my great-grandparents, my grandfather, and my father, along with his birth certificate, just in case questions arose about lineage. I may not need them, but I sleep better knowing they exist. Those costs are not included in the above total.

  • Every document must be apostilled. This is a separate authentication process that verifies the legitimacy of public documents for international use. Apostilles add both time and cost, and the process varies depending on whether the document is state or federally issued.

All of the records I plan to submit require apostilles, including birth, marriage, death, naturalization, ship manifests, and FBI clearance. Each record must be sent to the appropriate authority; the state records to the Secretary of State, federal records to the U.S. Department of State, along with forms and fees.

So far, my apostille costs total $305.00, with one state still remaining. I plan to handle Illinois in person because mail processing there is painfully slow. My mailing costs alone reached $92.45 and that amount increased when Florida rejected my apostille request because I included a church marriage record they would not certify. That error added a month-long delay and another trip to the post office.

Here’s my strongest advice: always include a prepaid return envelope with tracking. It costs more, but if documents are sent back by regular mail, they can disappear forever.

  •  FBI clearance was surprisingly the easiest step. You complete the application online and should not include your Social Security number, since the document will be sent overseas. After submitting the form, you’re directed to a local post office for fingerprinting. We opted for electronic fingerprints and received results almost immediately, before we even paid the fee while waiting in line at the site.

If electronic fingerprinting fails, you’ll need to use a paper card and mail it in, which adds time and cost. Ironically, the FBI clearance often considered the slowest part, was the fastest, aside from the three months it took for the apostille.

  • You will need a certified translator. Ask the consulate if they have preferred translators, or research carefully through reliable sources (yes, Reddit threads can be useful here). Certified translators are approved by the courts of the country where you’re applying, and they are expensive.

I haven’t completed all translations yet, but the estimated cost will be around $5,000. Some translators will assist with applications, biographies, and statements of intent; others will not. I chose to work with a genealogist who obtained my grandmother’s baptismal record, a trusted colleague who kindly offered a discounted rate.

  • This is where patience goes to die, acquiring records from the country of origin is not easier than obtaining them in the U.S.

In my case, it took two months to obtain a single certified record. The office closed for two weeks for vacation. When the genealogist arrived at the scheduled appointment, she was told, incorrectly, that the church had to issue the record. A week later, the church sent her back to the civil office. Then the church had to write a letter instructing the civil office to release the document. Two more weeks passed before the record was issued. Then it took three weeks for international mail to deliver it.

No one was rude. No one was helpful. Bureaucracy is bureaucracy everywhere.

  • Understand that dual citizenship is a process of hurry up and wait. Once our records are translated, my family will wait until late October for our consulate appointment in Chicago. There, a consular employee will review our documents to ensure we are submitting the correct ones. Copies will be retained by the consulate, the certified apostilled originals with transcription and that apostilled sent overseas (and yes, I ordered extras because I’m paranoid). There is a fee for submission that is reasonable, considering how much was already spent.

After submission, the waiting begins, sometimes two to five years or more.

I also incurred costs for hotel/gas/parking/meals while we tried to obtain records in person. ($703.47).

So far, I’ve spent less than average as typically dual citizenship can cost between $10,000-20,000.00. My cost was less because I sought out the records on my own in all but one case. I also did not hire a lawyer which is sometimes needed, depending on the country and the situation.

So why would anyone willingly endure this?

Everyone’s reasons are different. For my family, it’s about global mobility and connection. We still practice the customs of my grandmother’s culture, and when we are in Croatia, it feels like home. There should be a language barrier because our Croatian stinks but somehow we razumjeti (understand). I’ll be working on improving while we wait for the decision.

Others pursue dual citizenship for healthcare, education, lower living costs, or expanded career opportunities. Business owners may relocate to continue serving existing clients while building new markets. And many younger applicants, especially those in their twenties, simply want options. I hear that sentiment often.

Dual citizenship is not a weekend project, a budget-friendly endeavor, or a fast-track solution to anything. It is expensive, slow, frustrating, and emotionally taxing. It requires organization, patience, and a tolerance for bureaucracy that most people don’t realize they lack until they’re knee-deep in certified copies and apostille forms.

But for those who value connection, opportunity, and the ability to move through the world with greater freedom, it can be worth every delay and every dollar.

My goal in sharing this update isn’t to persuade you one way or the other. It’s to help you make an informed decision. If you choose to pursue dual citizenship, go in with open eyes, realistic expectations, and a very good filing system. And if you decide it’s not for you, that’s not failure, that’s wisdom.

If this process has taught me anything, it’s that knowing what you’re walking into makes all the difference.

Two Kinds of Learners (and Why Genealogy Needs Both)

AI Generated

Someone recently observed that there are two kinds of people in the world:

Those who learn by reading the manual.
And those who learn by pushing buttons.

My husband calls me “click-happy.” He means it affectionately and accurately. When I’m faced with new technology, my instinct is to explore. To try things. To see what happens. That’s how I learn.

Some people learn top-down. They want the framework first. The theory. The rules. They read, then they act.

Others learn bottom-up. They learn by doing. By experimenting. By poking at the edges and seeing what’s possible, then building understanding from experience.

And over the years, I’ve realized something important: neither of these approaches is wrong.

Most of us are actually a mix of both, depending on the tool and the stakes.

But in genealogy? Let’s be honest. Very few of us learned Ancestry, FamilySearch, DNA tools, or mapping tools by sitting down with a 300-page manual first. We learned by searching. Clicking. Trying. Backing up. Trying again.

And when I look back at some of the most important breakthroughs in my own research: Croatia, the Palatine migrations, strange boundary changes, unexpected court records, whole clusters of “this can’t be right… oh wait, it is” moments, not a single one of them began with a manual.

They began with curiosity.

With clicking.

With trying something that wasn’t in the plan.

The manual tells you how a tool is supposed to work. Exploration shows you what it’s actually good for.

Here’s the part that really matters, though: the real risk in genealogy (and in tech generally) isn’t clicking. It’s not having good habits.

What actually protects your work is not fear. It’s practice:

  • Working on copies, not originals
  • Having backups (and backups of backups)
  • Using version history and undo (Ctrl+Z) after analyzing and discovering your first find wasn’t accurate
  • Not trusting any single tool, human or machine, blindly

Fear doesn’t protect data. Habits do.

We already live in a world where far more damage is done by accidental deletes, bad syncing, overwritten files, and simple human error than by any new tool. AI doesn’t change that reality, it just joins the long list of tools we learn to use wisely.

And in a field like genealogy, which is built on exploration, pattern-spotting, and following trails that might go nowhere, curiosity isn’t a flaw. It’s a requirement.

Archives don’t come with manuals.
Families don’t come with instructions.
Records don’t announce what they’re going to reveal.

You find things by trying paths that might not work.

So yes, some people will always prefer to read first and click later. Others will click first and read later. Both approaches have value. But let’s not confuse curiosity with recklessness, or caution with wisdom.

We don’t need fewer curious genealogists.

We need more curious genealogists with good habits.

Because almost every real discovery starts the same way:

“Huh. I wonder what happens if I click this.”

Ultimate Guide to Mastering FamilySearch Book Review

Available at Genealogical.com

Today’s blog is a book review of Ultimate Guide to Mastering FamilySearch by Dana Ann Palmer. Long-time readers won’t be surprised to learn how this review came about; it was a classic Lorism moment.

Shortly before Christmas, during a snowstorm, my husband braved the walk to the mailbox while I stayed inside working on a client report. “You got a package,” he called. I wasn’t expecting anything; our Christmas gifts were already wrapped and stacked in a box waiting to be transported to one of our adult children’s homes on Christmas Eve. Curious, I abandoned my computer to investigate.

The return address was Genealogical Publishing Company, but I couldn’t recall ordering anything. Inside was Ultimate Guide to Mastering FamilySearch, along with a packing slip clearly intended for someone else. Confused, I emailed the publisher and received a quick reply: I could keep the book, and they’d look into the mix-up. After a couple of emails back and forth, I agreed to write a blog post about it.

Apparently, the universe really wanted me to have this book and you might want one, too.

This is a hefty volume and very much a “start here” guide for those who want to use FamilySearch.org but aren’t, as my husband affectionately calls me, “click-happy.” By that, he means fearless and impatient: I will boldly click my way through a new website without hesitation. If FamilySearch feels overwhelming or intimidating, this book is clearly designed for you.

It’s also well-suited for people who aren’t particularly comfortable with computers. The book is packed with screenshots showing exactly what the pages look like, so readers can follow along visually and reassure themselves they’re in the right place.

That visual-heavy approach did raise one concern, which I shared with the publisher: websites change. A lot. Screenshots age quickly, and I worried the book could become obsolete. I was told that updates would be posted on the publisher’s website if FamilySearch undergoes major changes. Problem solved.

If you’re a beginner but not much of a reader, no worries. Although the book runs 225 pages, most of that is screenshots, arrows, and visual cues. The actual text is limited. Follow the red arrows and you’ll be just fine.

My advice for everyone, regardless of experience level, is to start with the summary on page 222. It’s one of the strongest sections of the book and provides a solid overview. The Table of Contents and Index are also genuinely useful, especially for intermediate users who already know the basics and want to jump directly to specific tools.

I was surprised to see that the book includes information on CETs (Community Owned Trees), which are user-created trees donated to FamilySearch via GEDCOM. These are not the same as the global Family Tree that all users can edit. What isn’t stated and really should be is the usual caveat: like all online trees, errors happen. Beginners especially need to remember that information being recorded does not make it correct.

That said, CETs are typically created and donated by professional genealogists. Are they perfect? No. But they are far more likely to be compiled using the Genealogical Proof Standard and to be fully sourced. I plan to donate my own tree someday, assuming I ever finish my Great Britain research (sigh).

I was equally pleased to see extensive coverage of one of my favorite FamilySearch tools: the FamilySearch Wiki. This is an outstanding resource, particularly when used alongside a traditional search engine and AI tools. The Wiki is often the fastest way to determine what records exist, where they’re held, and what gaps remain. Not everything has been digitized, and the Wiki helps keep expectations realistic.

It’s important to remember that the Wiki is static, it changes only when FamilySearch employees update it. My recommendation is to start there, then move on to dynamic tools like search engines and AI to see what else might be available.

For intermediate users and above, the searching tricks in Chapter 3 are especially useful. We can all use a reminder to use Boolean searching effectively. The book also walks readers through FamilySearch’s AI-powered Full-Text Search tool. If you haven’t had success with it yet, the step-by-step instructions here are worth following. Full-Text Search, combined with DNA results, has helped me solve several brick walls in just the past year.

I was also glad to see a section devoted to Images, which was my favorite FamilySearch feature long before Full-Text Search existed and one I still rely on heavily. One thing I’d add, though, is a warning for beginners: microfilm collections can be confusing. To avoid waste, records from one locality may be followed immediately by entirely different record types from another place halfway around the world. It’s efficient, but it can definitely throw off someone new to the platform.

My only real suggestion for improvement is that the book should begin with a clear, step-by-step explanation of how to create a FamilySearch account. It isn’t difficult, but for users who don’t spend much time online, even that first step can be intimidating.

Ultimate Guide to Mastering FamilySearch does exactly what it promises: it walks beginners, patiently and visually, through a platform that can otherwise feel overwhelming. Its strength lies in its screenshots, structured guidance, and clear explanations of core tools, especially the Wiki, Full-Text Search, and Images.

If you’re new to FamilySearch, not especially tech-savvy, and prefer learning by seeing rather than reading, this book will likely feel reassuring and approachable. More experienced researchers may find it useful as a reference or refresher, though not groundbreaking.

In short: this is a visual instruction manual, not a methodology guide. Used wisely, it can help users get oriented and move in the right direction. Used uncritically, it risks reinforcing the idea that genealogy is about following arrows rather than evaluating evidence. As always, the tool is only as good as the researcher using it.

Available in both ebook and print through Genealogical.com.

Registration Is Open for the 2026 NGS Family History Conference — And I’m Teaching a 3-Hour AI Workshop!

The National Genealogical Society has officially opened registration for the 2026 NGS Family History Conference, taking place May 26-30, 2026 in Fort Wayne, Indiana. If you’ve been thinking about attending a major genealogy conference next year, this is a wonderful opportunity. Fort Wayne is home to the world-renowned Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center,making it one of the best locations in the country for genealogical research and learning.

I’m excited to share that I’ll be teaching a three-hour beginner workshop on using AI as a genealogy research assistant.

This workshop is designed specifically for those who are:

  • curious about AI but not sure where to start
  • overwhelmed by new technology
  • wondering what AI actually does for genealogists
  • looking for tools that make research and writing easier
  • eager to work smarter, not just harder on their projects

What We’ll Cover

During this interactive session, we’ll explore:

  • How AI can help you plan and structure research
  • Where it can (and cannot) interpret records
  • How to create stronger logs, summaries, and timelines
  • Ways to improve your historical writing and citations
  • Best practices for accuracy, ethics, and reliability
  • How to build your own repeatable AI workflows

My goal is to give you tools you can use immediately, whether you’re working on a family story, preparing a client report, or tackling a brick-wall ancestor.

Why AI Matters for Genealogists

AI doesn’t replace genealogical reasoning. Instead, it strengthens organization, speeds up repetitive tasks, and frees you to focus on the analysis and interpretation that only a human researcher can do. It’s an exciting time in our field, and I’m thrilled to help genealogists explore these tools in practical, down-to-earth ways.

Join Us in Fort Wayne!

If you’ve never attended an NGS conference before, you’re in for a treat. You’ll find:

  • dozens of sessions across skill levels
  • networking with researchers from across the country
  • access to one of the world’s best genealogical libraries
  • opportunities to learn new methods, tools, and approaches

You can register now through the NGS website:
👉 Register

I hope to see you in Fort Wayne next May and I can’t wait to share this workshop with you!